AdTech Field Notes / Publication information
Editorial standards
A useful lesson must survive a source check.
Evidence before a lesson
A claim about a product, measurement method, date, or historical role needs an identified source. A broader inference is labeled as editorial analysis. A plausible industry lesson cannot be presented as Daniel’s personal view without his explicit confirmation.
Exact text and image review
The complete article, metadata, source list, proposed release date, and final image are reviewed together. Publication requires Daniel’s explicit written approval naming the current article and image versions. Informal assent or an earlier approval is insufficient; a subsequent change returns the package to review.
Tools do not supply evidence
AI assisted the initial site and policy copy and may assist later drafting. Material assistance is disclosed on the article. Humans remain responsible for facts, scope, and image rights. An AI-assisted portrait needs consent, final-image approval, and visible disclosure; it must not suggest an undocumented event.
One original, a visible correction
A field note belongs to one canonical URL. Full article bodies are not duplicated across these publications. Substantive errors receive dated corrections after the revised package is approved.